Introduction.
Moses is considered to be one
of the greatest leaders the Lord's people ever had, yet Moses was a reluctant
leader. When the Lord instructed Moses to return to Egypt and lead his people out of
the land of bondage, Moses did not respond positively. Listen to his response
to this call to leadership in Exodus 3:11, ‘Who am I that I should
go to Pharaoh, and that I should bring the children of Israel out of Egypt??' As a former prince in
Egypt, Moses would have had the best possible education and training in
leadership, yet he does not see himself as the right man for this task. This
objection is overcome by the Lord's promise, ‘I will be with you.' God in his grace assures Moses that he will
be guiding, directing and providing everything that he will need to exercise
the role of leadership. The Lord called Moses to a leadership role that
required him to walk with the Lord in total dependence. Moses would never be on
his own, the Lord would be with him granting him strength and wisdom. Every
Christian has the comfort of knowing that when the Lord places them in the position
of leadership he will be with them. Those who belong to the Lord ought to be
greatly comforted by the fact that if God by his providence places them in a
position of leadership, he will be with them to exercise that leadership. In a
Christian home the husband is appointed by God to be the head of the home. It
is a great blessing to know that the Lord is with you as you carry the burden
of leadership. We need to constantly remind ourselves that the home is the
place where good leadership is needed most. The demands of home leadership are
thrust upon wives and mothers when husbands die, or homes are fractured by
divorce. One of the tasks faced by newly married couples is adjusting to the
husband taking up the reins of home leadership to honour Christ and glorify
God. Leadership is a burden and a difficult and complex task. When Elimelech
and his two sons died the burden of leadership fell onto Naomi's shoulders. Ruth
1:6-17 reveals the struggle Naomi had with the demands of leadership.
1. Naomi had the heavy weight of
leadership thrust upon her.
- The burden of leadership
came to Naomi in grim circumstance. The loss of her husband and two sons filled
her with deep grief and profound sorrow. Having suffered such a loss we would
expect Naomi to be heartbroken and emotionally worn out. Exercising leadership
over Orpah and Ruth would have been very demanding as they were mourning the
loss of their husbands. Being the leader of a group of bereaved widows is a
very complex and perplexing task, as bereavement is usually accompanied by
instability. Her leadership was made more difficult by the fact she was an
Israelite widow living in Moab.
The Moabites did not have laws that offered the protection found in Exodus
20:21-23 ‘You shall neither
mistreat a stranger nor oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. You shall not afflict any widow
or fatherless child. If you afflict them in any way, and they ??cry at all to Me, I will surely ?hear their cry; and
My ?wrath will become hot, and I will kill you with the sword; ? ?your wives
shall be widows, and your children fatherless.' Naomi faced the task of
leadership without any laws that assisted her or provided safety and security.
Being in Moab
she lacked the support usually given by relatives and was from a human
perspective very much alone. The sense of being alone increases the pressure of
leadership and can lead to a strong feeling of being trapped. To whom could
Naomi turn for counsel? Orpah and Ruth loved Naomi, but their sorrow and grief
would not have made the burden of her leadership lighter or easier.
- Naomi had the burden of
leadership thrust upon her at a time when she was in a very poor state
spiritually. Backsliders do not seek the face of the Lord, nor do they turn to
his Word for wisdom and guidance. Backsliders do not turn to the Lord for
counsel. Naomi like every Jew of her day would have known most of the Books of
Moses off by heart, but in a backslidden state she would not have referred to
them. The questions, ‘What am I going to
do, and what can I do' would have hounded her day and night. I am sure that
Orpah and Ruth would have asked her that question over and over again. Every
time the question was asked the pressure of responsibility increased. This kind
of pressure in leadership makes you feel as if you are living in a pressure
cooker and the urgency to do something to relieve the pressure becomes
enormous. This pressure-cooker situation
often results in people making poor and irrational decisions. Naomi's daughters
in-law would have looked to her for leadership and expected her to know the
right and appropriate thing to do. When others give you the responsibility to
make life-securing and life-changing decisions it places an enormous amount of
pressure on your leadership. When Orpah and Ruth set off with Naomi to go to Bethlehem their actions
demonstrated that they accepted her leadership. As they traveled towards Bethlehem, Naomi would
have been very much aware of the fact that Orpah and Ruth placed their futures
in her leadership. The question, what am
I going to do, was answered by the decision to go to Bethlehem,
but a new question began demanding an answer, What am I going to do when we get to Bethlehem? Her life, like that of Orpah
and Ruth was filled with uncertainties. None of us likes to live, a life
dominated by uncertainty and insecurity. Naomi had this heavy burden of
leadership thrust upon her while she was spiritually backslidden and
emotionally worn out. Being in a backslidden state is very hard as you do not
have the comfort, peace, rest and strength of going to the Lord in prayer and
fellowship. Backsliders can say prayers, but they do not engage in fellowship
with the Lord and therefore feel that their prayers are in vain. The picture
you should have in your mind of Naomi is that of a woman who is under enormous
pressure and carrying an enormous burden of leadership without anyone to turn
to. Her situation is desperate and hopeless.
- When Naomi tells her
daughters-in-law to return to the homes of their mothers, she is seeking to
shed the burden of leadership. Naomi is really telling them, ‘I do not want to be responsible for your
futures; I have nothing to offer you, do not put your hope in me.' I
believe that Naomi was finding the pressure of leadership too much to bear.
Coping with the loss of a husband and two adult sons would be extremely
difficult even if all the supports and safety nets of family and friends were
in place. Naomi without a doubt was a very strong and determined woman and
coped with her situation very well. Listen to Orpah and Ruth affirming their
acceptance of Naomi's leadership in Ruth 1:10, "Surely we will return with you to your people." Orpah and Ruth
refuse to leave Naomi and commit themselves to a future with Naomi's people.
Naomi's response in Ruth 1:12-15 needs to be understood in the context of what was
known as the ‘Levirate Law.' The word
‘Levir' is a Latin word translating the Hebrew word for ‘husband's brother.' When a married man died without a child his
brother was expected to take the widow as his wife, children from this marriage
were counted as children of the dead brother, and therefore these children
would receive the dead brother's inheritance. Listen to Deuteronomy 25:5-6 dealing
with this law, ‘If brothers dwell
together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall
not be married to a stranger
outside the family; her
husband's brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the
duty of a husband's brother to her. And it shall be that the firstborn son which she
bears ??will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be
blotted out of Israel.'
The purpose of this law was to stop the name
of the dead brother from being blotted out of Israel. In Naomi's case there was a strong possibility
that the name of her husband Elimelech would be blotted out as both Orpah and
Ruth were childless widows. Naomi did not believe that the Levirate Law offered
her or her daughters in-law any hope or future. Naomi makes 3 points:
- She considered herself too old to have a husband even
under the Levirate Law.
- There was no guarantee that she would bare sons
rather than daughters.
- Asking her daughters in-law to wait another 20 odd
years for a husband was too much to ask.
Naomi shows good leadership
in being honest, practical and sensitive to the needs and aspirations of her
daughters in-law. Naomi realised that Orpah and Ruth longed to have families
and she had no means of meeting this need. The depth of Naomi's sympathy for her
daughters in law can be seen in verses 13, ‘No, my daughters; for it grieves me very much for your sakes that
??the hand of the Lord has gone
out against me!?' Naomi recognises that Orpah and Ruth had suffered,
because the Lord had afflicted her, she was indirectly responsible for their
sorrow and desperate plight. Listen to Matthew Henry's comment on this
aspect of Naomi's responsibility, ‘She (Naomi) judges herself chiefly aimed at in the
affliction, that God's quarrel was principally with her: "The hand of the Lord has gone out
against me. I am the sinner; it is with me that God has a controversy;
it is with me that he is contending; I take it to myself.'' This well becomes
us when we are under affliction; though many others share in the trouble, yet
we must hear the voice of the rod as if it spoke only against us and to us, not
billeting the rebukes of it at other people's houses, but taking them to
ourselves.' Jonah's sin of refusing
to go to Nineveh
to preach repentance as the Lord commanded him caused suffering and loss to all
the sailors on the ship he boarded to escape the task. We need to recognise
that our sinful words or actions often cause others to suffer deeply. Naomi's
task of leadership was made heavier by her sense that she had caused her daughters
in-law severe suffering.
- Orpah is persuaded by
Naomi's arguments and returns to her mother's house and so releases Naomi of
part of her burden of leadership. Ruth, rather than being persuaded by the
arguments clings more tightly to Naomi. The Hebrew word translated as
"cling" is the same word used in Genesis 2:24, listen to the
translation of the King James Version, ‘Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and
shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.' Ruth cleaved to Naomi which indicates the deepest bond
possible between two people. The saying ‘joined
at the hip' is probably the best way to describe the concept of cleaving;
husband and wife ought to be joined at
the hip.' I do not think that Naomi felt this way about Ruth and this made
her task of leadership more complicated as Ruth had bound up her future with
the future of her mother in-law. Naomi was in the position of leadership and
Ruth would not allow her to relinquish this duty. In Ruth 1:18 we are told, ‘When she (Naomi) saw that she (Ruth) was
determined to go with her, she stopped speaking to her.' I believe one of
the reasons Naomi stopped speaking to Ruth was that she was too busy thinking
about the burden Ruth would be to her in Bethlehem.
The question, what am I going to do with
Ruth when we get to Bethlehem,
must have passed through her mind a thousand times. I do not believe it
would be wrong to think that at this stage Naomi saw Ruth as a burden she did
not need. In my minds eye I can see Naomi shaking her head and thinking please give me a break. The burden of
leadership is made very difficult when others demand your leadership and you do
not want to lead because you feel empty and bewildered by your circumstances
and situation. How should you think of Naomi? Think of her as a woman at her
wits end, who is spiritually backslidden, grieving deeply at her dreadful loss,
and exercising leadership reluctantly. The packaging sticker which reads fragile, handle with care sums up
Naomi's state. Thinking of Naomi in this way enables us to understand why she
told the women in Bethlehem,
"Do not call me ??Naomi; call me ??Mara.'
How can a person in Naomi's fragile state find a place for pleasantness?
The only answer is in the ever-loving and
everlasting arms of God. Naomi was
in a backslidden state and therefore did not enjoy the benefits of fellowship
with the Almighty.
2. Learning to live by faith rather than
sight.
- Believers who are in a
backslidden state live by sight rather than faith. Paul in 2 Corinthians 5:7 says, ‘For ??we walk by faith, not by sight.'
This should be true of you if you are a Christian. Being very honest about
myself I must confess that I tend to live by faith and by sight. As I grow in
grace I trust that I will progressively live more by faith than by sight.
Living by faith is difficult as it calls on us to live believing what the
Scripture says is true and reality, and fully recognise that what we see by
sight is always incomplete. If you live by sight you are living on less than
reality. What we see is only the tip of the iceberg. Using sight we do not see
the continuous activity of the Lord in our lives and our circumstance and
situation. We see what is visible and much, much more happens in the realm of
what is not seen than you and I could ever imagine. When we are backslidden we
live by sight and do not take into account the fact that God is present and at
work in all things. It does not take much to sink those living by sight into a
pit of despondency and despair. Naomi was on the brink of despair.
- The great difference
between living by sight and faith is the focus. The focus of sight is upon
self, were as the focus of faith is God. Sight asks, what can I see happening, physically or in my mind's eye? Faith
asks, what is the Lord telling me? Naomi
was not in a spiritual state to ask the question faith constantly asks. I have
no doubt that Naomi knew the theory, but she was not able to do the spiritual
exercises that faith requires. In Ruth 1 Naomi refers to God by the
titles of LORD and Almighty. The significance of these titles for believers is
enormous. The origin of the title Lord is found in Exodus 3. God appeared to
Moses in the burning bush and instructed him to go back to Egypt and lead the people of Israel out of
the land of bondage. In Exodus 3:13-14 Moses offers a reason
why he should not do as the Lord has commanded. Listen to the interaction
between Moses and God, "Then Moses said
to God, "?Indeed, when I come
to the children of Israel and say to them, ‘?The God of your fathers has sent
me to you,?' and they say to me, ‘?What is
His name??' what shall I say to them??" And God said to Moses, "I AM WHO I AM."
And He said, "Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to
you.?'" God reveals himself as the great I AM, the one who is always
present, always with his people, always actively involved in their lives,
always committed to his people, and always faithful to his covenant. If Naomi
had stopped and thought about God as the great I AM she would have grasped that
she was blind to the fact that he was with her, fully involved in her life,
committed to her and would be totally faithful to the covenant. The fact that
Naomi was not looking at life through the eyes of faith did not make any
difference to the reality of who God is and what he was doing. Her perception
of carrying the heavy burden of leadership all alone was not reality, but the
product of faith in a very poor condition. We look at God's Word and through
the eyes of faith see the truth about God's total involvement in our lives.
Backsliding affects our eyes of faith as cataracts affect our physical eyes.
Naomi did not see life through the eyes of faith and suffered great anxiety in
heart and mind because she did not see God at work.
- The other title Naomi
uses for God is Almighty. What does
the Hebrew word Shaddai mean? As the
etymology of the word is not clear, we extract the meaning from the context in
which this title is used. Looking at the way the title is used in Genesis gives
us a wonderful insight into the meaning behind this title. In Genesis
17:1 the title is used when God makes a covenant with Abraham promising
that he will be the father of many nations. Listen to that verse, When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord ?appeared to Abram and said to him,
?"?I am ?Almighty God; ??walk
before Me and be ??blameless. And I will make My ??covenant between Me and you,
and will multiply you exceedingly.?" The title is used to convey to Abraham
that his childless situation was not hopeless and helpless; God can transform
the situation into a great blessing. In Genesis 43 Jacob filled with
perplexity and fear reluctantly agrees to send his youngest son with his
brothers back to Egypt
to buy food. Listen to what Jacob says in verse 14, ‘And may God Almighty give you mercy before the man, that he may
release your other brother and Benjamin. ?If I am bereaved, I am bereaved!?' The
Almighty is the one who can give
protection in a time of danger and uncertainty. The Almighty gives hope in
hopeless situations. Jacob in Genesis 49:25 blesses Joseph
concerning the future. Listen to what he says, ‘By the God of your father who will help you, and by the Almighty who
will bless you with blessings
of heaven above, blessings of the deep that lies beneath, blessings of the
breasts and of the womb.' The Almighty
is seen as the one who blesses and makes fruitful. The title Shaddai refers to God as the one who
delights in transforming his people's helplessness and hopelessness into
blessing and abundance. The work described in Psalm 30:11 is typical of
the Almighty, ‘You have turned for me my
mourning into dancing; You have put off ??my sackcloth and clothed me with
gladness.' Naomi needed to be transformed; she needed to find the reality
of being a friend of the Almighty. The
Almighty was with her, but because of
her backsliding she found no assurance in his presence. Naomi needed to
exercise leadership by looking at life through the eyes of faith, but could not
because she was backslidden.
Conclusion.
The way of the backslider is
hard because they live by sight and not by faith. Seeing God's total
involvement in your life through the eyes of faith is true reality, anything
less than this is unreality. Leadership is very demanding, and overwhelming if
we are seeking to lead by sight and not by faith. As a child of the LORD Shaddai
you should enjoy the fullness of the security of knowing who he is and his
commitment to you in Christ Jesus. We ought to live like those who see reality,
rather than those who stumble through life because they are blind to the glory,
majesty and power of God. If you belong to God you can never be in a situation
that is helpless and hopeless. May God open our eyes fully.